Skip to main content
Loading…
This section is included in your selections.

The town may grant variances from this critical areas code’s substantive regulations in accordance with this chapter if the criteria in subsection A or B of this section are met.

A. The variance conforms to the variance criteria stated in this chapter plus the variance:

1. Conforms with the purpose of this chapter;

2. Does not impact anadromous fish habitat; and

3. Is justifiable in light of the best available science.

B. Reasonable use (conformance with the South Prairie critical areas code criteria not required):

1. The application of this critical areas code would otherwise deny all reasonable economic use of the property;

2. The town does not offer to compensate the owner for the denial of reasonable economic use;

3. No other reasonable economic use of the property or development design has less impact on the critical area;

4. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare;

5. The proposal conforms with other applicable regulations;

6. Impacts to critical areas are mitigated; and

7. The application is sufficiently documented (for example, critical areas report, mitigation plan, permit applications, and environmental documents) to make a determination regarding these criteria. [Ord. 492 § 3 (Exh. B § 114), 2007.]